Originally Posted by
forgot to bid
This whole thing is so underwhelming isn't it?
It's like a pilot who's run an aircraft off the end of the runway twice telling you how to fly your plane. It makes no sense to say these are the best lawyers in the business when they wrote our section 1, a colossal jewel of what not to do, and then don't even bother to enforce it anyways.
It's far worse than just that ftb. These lawyers knew full well of the 1974 court case that set the precedent that labor can be forced to end a strike if it is over Scope. These lawyers knew full well that if anything in Section 1 is ever given up, it can never be won back via a strike if the give back is later proven to be a bad thing. These lawyers knew this and said nothing. THAT'S how bad ALPA lawyers are.
Originally Posted by
forgot to bid
Who in the hell does ALPA have as lawyers?!?!?
See above.
Originally Posted by
forgot to bid
If they don't try or win this redefine the definition of air carrier so as to beat back RAH then I sure as hell hope nobody has the gall to tell us to do anything but demand we go to court and have them fired.
I know I sound like a broken record here man, but ALPA will NOT allow DALPA to file a grievance on this. Period. ALPA's goal is membership increases. That goal is incompatible with doing something that might anger RAH pilots.
BTW, it looks like this post of yours is APC's 1 millionth post. Congrats.
Carl