Thread: 9e/xj/9l sli
View Single Post
Old 06-07-2011 | 06:42 AM
  #33  
higney85's Avatar
higney85
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 6
From: Bus driver
Default

Originally Posted by Flitestar
Bear with me fellas, I've been disconnected for a few weeks from these issues, and I'm not too well versed in loa/lawyer type lingo... Is the main argument here the fact that 9E had pilot seniority lists based on checkride date instead of CLASS date, like Mesaba?
Mesaba's merger cmte wants us to use checkride dates instead of day 1 of class. This issue was dealt with in the JCBA under Transition LOA 2.V. Some think that ALPA Merger policy says when we go into the payroll/HR system (which was day 1 of class), and Labor Law holds that firm with the I-9 form. Day 1 of CLASS fulfills all requirements, is legal, and was even done contractually to avoid any issues. To show how this was so easily adopted- the company had already changed our dates without having to ask. Everyone has complied, but the XJ merger guys aren't liking the situation.

They are fighting for their pilots, but it's now the second round of the same battle. In the end they want to have all 9E pilots on an uneven footing for purposes of seniority integration. That helps their guys, but causes quite the riff when we are all supposed to be working through this challenge together.

There is the "grenade down the aisle" for the day.