Originally Posted by
oldmako
I think the whole 400 argument is a canard. The plane simply does stuff that the 777 cannot do. With UCAL's significant footprint in the Pacific, and with our current load factor I don't believe the argument that we can't fill it.
There you have it. How much etops fuel does a 777 land with in SYD after having flown from LAX? How much revenue is bumped due to the etops fuel requirements?