Originally Posted by
FAULTPUSH
Let me rephrase that: We didn't choose RAH over SWA. We said that a staple job was unacceptable without a lot of other stuff, and that was a deal-breaker. I think it was Sean Menke who said that even with an agreement, RAH would still have won the bid.
FAPA was concerned about that due to the total inequity of a staple job, and SWAPA unwillingness to guarantee jobs for the furloughees.
Nice of you guys to look out for the furloughees. A buddy of mine at UAL got a letter from ALPA basicly saying the furloughees fall by the wayside in a SLI.
