Originally Posted by
thevagabond
First off, I have yet to run into a single pilot here who feels entitled to one of your Airbus seats as a result of our purchase. .
1. I didn't say entitled. It was clear that RAH pilots were excited about the F9 purchase.
2. Then why did IBT object to the gist of the what the other three carriers were working on. Were you worried that our Airbus FO's wanted to bid RJ captain for less pay and lower QOL?
Originally Posted by
thevagabond
We purchased you. Therefore we do not get stapled to the bottom of your list.
Please point to a case where who purchased whom factored into the arbitration. Class and category has always been the predominant factor in SLI's.
Originally Posted by
thevagabond
. You also forgot to mention that the representation of the purchasing airline, the IBT, was the only one that offered a proposal which unselfishly offered a blending of all the different groups. .
Unselfishly? 300 regional jet captains ahead of every Airbus captain? That would be the same as if in the US Airways SLI had placed 300 Cactus pilots ahead of the A330 pilots, or Delta narrowbody captains ahead of Northwest 747 captains.
Originally Posted by
thevagabond
Secondly, Frontier is going to go west as they say and I don't want to be dragged down with you.
Finally a non-F9 guy who is also fallling for BB's line.