Originally Posted by
hockeypilot44
You don't have snap-backs. You negotiated a snap-back in bankruptcy that was just negated. .
We did have snap-backs negotiated, and we do now.
Originally Posted by
hockeypilot44
Profit sharing. Ha ha. You are in the strongest revenue environment ever for airlines like Carl said and are still losing a ridiculous amount of money.
Revenue has nothing to do with it. Profits are what keep you in business. It's just amazing to me that you didn't know that. That's why it's called "profit sharing" and not "revenue sharing".
Originally Posted by
hockeypilot44
When you guys lose your jobs with the next two years, we will laugh at you for degrading the profession. You guys are in a tight spot and hurting us all instead of falling with grace.
That's very kind of you. I've seen that kind of talk before, and it's very easy to talk tough when it's not your job on the line.
Originally Posted by
Fishfreighter
How about standing up to BB and calling his bluff? FAPA puts out the position "FULL PAY TO THE LAST DAY" and starts working to rule instead of folding like a house of cards in a typhoon.
You claim it's a bluff, against all common sense (just look at the numbers and tell me where they're hiding the money and I might think you have a case). I'm tired of you saying "he's bluffing", without providing any evidence to back it up.
I'll preempt you for next week: the upcoming announcement changes nothing.
Originally Posted by
Fishfreighter
Grow some nuts.
I don't have a lot of motivation to do so. Life is good, and I have more to lose by trying to gain that little bit more that than by just keeping things the same.
Originally Posted by
sizzlechest
I dig your response Cpt but an interview isn't going to tell you much when I am on my best behavior....You have only a few hours with a guy and, if he wants to, he can hide alot.
Try that argument at your next interview (i.e. "this interview is meaningless") and tell me how it works. Methinks they conduct interviews for a reason.