View Single Post
Old 07-10-2011 | 12:06 PM
  #70406  
acl65pilot's Avatar
acl65pilot
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Don't get me wrong, I am not defending the "discipline" letters, I think they are shortsighted. I would prefer a greatly expanded commuter policy than this one - essentially positive space to work.

Commuting sucks, I've done it for several years, it sucks. I dont even like flying in the back of a plane.

My only point is, in the original JG letter, there was the "discuss it with the CP" and the policy may have to be revisited if it doesnt work (which I took as meaning done away with.) That is standard policy writing 101.

Now the bigger and more shortsighted aspect of it is: You manage people the way you feel they (and you) should be managed. The disciplin-ish letter says a lot about that particular CP's sentiment toward line pilots and also about his sentiment toward himself.

If he feels that he must document every interaction with a pilot in order to have a chain of paper work in the event that said pilot would be eventually terminated, he needs to be terminated from being a CP. If his directions come from a managerial leadership its out of his hands, if not, it is him.
What I find very interesting is that pilots are running all over an airport to catch a commute to work, and the FA's are just sitting though one flight to get their PSY ticket. I see it all of the time out of DFW and frankly it is very frustrating because they really do not care. Furthermore they feel that it is not their right to do this since the company gave them the policy. I had one tell me that the company knew this was going to happen, and now that they gave it to us, it is what it is. It is part of the problem with these "me too" policies.