Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
Sorry to disappoint, out of deference to your opinion I've withdrawn the offending allegation.
In our scope history, concessions have always remained one step ahead of what is needed to allow airplanes that have already been ordered. That's an awful lucky coincidence, isn't it?
Follow the history of small jet orders from 1999 to 2010 and place that beside a time line of contract revisions. The correlation is remarkable, but more remarkable when you consider the orders preceded the scope changes.
You shouldn't have withdrawn it Bar. You were right the first time. You shouldn't let Pineapple Guy's statement of disappoint make you edit a correct post of yours.
Carl