Originally Posted by
slowplay
How about we complete the statement in context (in red above), groundskeeper. Attending and throwing parties isn't the only reason LUV has been successful. They've made some very good profits too.
I used your entire statement and in context. You started off claiming that "old school" unionism resulted in lower pay rates. When I pointed out UPS, you quickly changed your premise from one of "old school" unionism to one of a profitability comparison. Your highlighting of the words passenger and passenger airline are meaningless to your obvious deflection of the subject that YOU began with. That is, from "old school" unionism to one of profitability.
Again, I'm not the only one who notices.
Carl