Originally Posted by
kilofoxtrot
I don't agree with you at all! SureJet has the feel of a fly by night, startup company that no one is going to remember in a few years. City Jet sounds better, even something like Atlantic Jet. Who did they talk to about this?? I feel let down, and it doesnt even sound good or feel good to say. Hello I work at SureJet! Dont like it, very dissapointed!!
I agree that how they came up with the name and didn't really include anyone in the making was wrong. I can see how people would be disappointed with something as subtle and simple as Surejet coming out at a "reveal".
Although I don't really care what the name of my company is, I don't know if it is possible to satisfy the majority of 10K employees in any name change scenario. When I interviewed at ASA and chose ASA after a few offers, my determining point had nothing to do with the name ASA. Point is, I think it's more important to be concerned with QOL, pay, and the future of my job then feeling cool when I tell someone who I work for.
Naming this company is important but I think there are much bigger issues that have nothing to do with the name of these two companies merging.
But we will see I guess. This is just my opinion as I wanted to add to the discussion. No offense intended. Sorry if I did.