Originally Posted by
JustUnderPar
From all the buzz I have been hearing I guess UPS is squeezing many efficiencies out of its pilots. As long as we have a large group of our members no knowing the contract, it is not going to change any time soon.
Careful for what you wish for. I guess you can't spell stupid without UPS, but I guess they are the one's laughing right now. That's what we get for having a hot head in a critical position.
Seriously...and I am sincerely asking:
If we had elected either of the other two choices, do you think (and stipulate which choice and why you agree with):
1) UPS would not have furloughed
2) They would have violated the CBA less
3) We would have made concessions to the existing CBA
4) And if yes to #3, what concessions YOU would have supported
5) In general do you consider UPS to be an honorable company?