Quote:
For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion to
strike the reports of McCormick and Seham and bar their
testimony as experts at the trial is granted. Their opinions
are based far more on speculation than on their "knowledge,
skill, experience, training or education." Their purported
testimony is not the product of discernible, let alone
reliable, principles and methods.
So what other untruths do you have for us today, Carl?
Seham's firm represented AMFA when you crossed their picket line, Carl. There used to be 18000 AMFA members, now there are 3000. There are no AMFA member jobs left at Delta. Everyone knows the Seham represented USAPA story. DPA promotes a dues reduction to 1%, but Seham represented USAPA is at 1.95% PLUS assessments while Seham's firm's $57,000 per week rolls in. As far as "beating" ALPA, why did AirTran's NPA and Continental's IACP leave Seham for ALPA?
Oh, you forgot to mention that Seham's firm was retained by APA when they negotiated the industry first "B" scale contract. When the firm was let go they then supported AICA, a DPA-like rogue movement away from an already independent union. His firm is trying to do the DPA thing with the American Airlines mechanics.
You also fail to mention his firms work at El Al and Varig...work for management against labor.
So why is it that Seham has cut the following deal as reported by DPA:
Our current arrangement with SSMP Law includes a waived retainer fee and a partner rate of only $250 per hour. DPA is billed for only half that rate with the remaining half to be invoiced in stepped payments only when we are successfully certified.
Is SSMP a group of "B" scale lawyers, or are they a group that preys on dissatisfaction to profiteer?
Carl, you should pay attention better as opposed to reading only enough to refute, then jump on the keyboard.
Hey I want a copy of the TWA case! I've been looking for a while, is it published online?Originally Posted by slowplay
The following is an excerpt from what the judge had to say in an oral ruling barring the Lee Seham report and his potential testimony. For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion to
strike the reports of McCormick and Seham and bar their
testimony as experts at the trial is granted. Their opinions
are based far more on speculation than on their "knowledge,
skill, experience, training or education." Their purported
testimony is not the product of discernible, let alone
reliable, principles and methods.
So what other untruths do you have for us today, Carl?
Seham's firm represented AMFA when you crossed their picket line, Carl. There used to be 18000 AMFA members, now there are 3000. There are no AMFA member jobs left at Delta. Everyone knows the Seham represented USAPA story. DPA promotes a dues reduction to 1%, but Seham represented USAPA is at 1.95% PLUS assessments while Seham's firm's $57,000 per week rolls in. As far as "beating" ALPA, why did AirTran's NPA and Continental's IACP leave Seham for ALPA?
Oh, you forgot to mention that Seham's firm was retained by APA when they negotiated the industry first "B" scale contract. When the firm was let go they then supported AICA, a DPA-like rogue movement away from an already independent union. His firm is trying to do the DPA thing with the American Airlines mechanics.
You also fail to mention his firms work at El Al and Varig...work for management against labor.
So why is it that Seham has cut the following deal as reported by DPA:
Our current arrangement with SSMP Law includes a waived retainer fee and a partner rate of only $250 per hour. DPA is billed for only half that rate with the remaining half to be invoiced in stepped payments only when we are successfully certified.
Is SSMP a group of "B" scale lawyers, or are they a group that preys on dissatisfaction to profiteer?
Carl, you should pay attention better as opposed to reading only enough to refute, then jump on the keyboard.