I haven't heard ONE person say they would give up the "FIVE...whoops, I mean FOUR days off" language in exchange for 150% premium pay. That's absurd and simply not true.

The folks implying that are using it as a scare tactic to drum up support for the "anti-recall" base.

It's the same scare tactic that most of us heard last week: "But...but...if FH is recalled, I hear that Matt N. automatically takes his position because he finished runner-up in the last local election. Isn't that true?" Again, simply not true and meant to stir up even more anger, maybe even the "anti-Herb" anger that STILL exist at this joint even though he's resigned!

Quit spreading these "preposterous, outrageous, and heinous" accusations (a Johnny Cochran reference).

You guys are smarter than that.