Originally Posted by
slowplay
I think the more accurate questions are:
When Comair loses $40 million, which airline actually pays the money?
When RAH makes a $40 million profit, which
airlines actually paid the money?



Slow,
Your numbers (at least the direction) are probably right, but, Delta has done about everything possible to hurt Comair, following their strike. Pulling Comair's operations down resulted in very inefficient utilization of jets and crews. Sticking them with the old and unloved jets while trading away their new and more efficient jets made them more expensive. Using them as the Crack Spackle to fill in for Mesa killed their operational integrity and increased costs.
There is no doubt Delta is the worst regional airline management team in the history of the business.
Today we could buy AMR and their New York terminal for half of what we paid for Comair.
Comair's problems are not Comair's fault. They are division of Delta and Delta has spent around $18 billion (rough guess) feeding and expanding Comair's competition.
Maybe you can explain it to me, it does not make any sense unless this is some sort of vindictive thing that should be in the special victims unit of some Kentucky family law practice.
Imho they should have either expanded Comair and made it sexy to sell it, or taken it out back and shot it in the head. The "in between" has been painful to watch.