Originally Posted by
FAULTPUSH
Ad Hominem. Which furthers my point. Thank you!
Can you respond with a reasoned argument, or is that all you can muster?
Perhaps I should be clearer about my point: UPS and SWA are amongst the highest paid airlines in the country (or THE highest, depending on how you measure it)? What unions represent them?
argumentum ad logicam. And for your "point", correlation does not imply causation.
A year ago, before the SLI, were you clamoring to get rid of FAPA for IPA? When you still thought you could avoid the SLI results you agreed to (binding arbitration and all), were you clamoring for IPA? Finally, when you took concessions to add $10M to the company coffers, (not save the company) were you clamoring for IPA?
I hope we succeed in stopping this "FAPAinvest LLC" shell game, what a farcical attempt at circumventing scope and NMB elections. I completely disagree with FAPA's approach to this problem, but I understand it's actions.