View Single Post
Old 08-29-2011 | 02:04 PM
  #35  
HAL39's Avatar
HAL39
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: 21°00'18.5"N 156°39'00.0"W
Default

Originally Posted by FauxPilot
What others are you thinking, I was under the impression of that market the 170 has the best runway performance.
I was thinking the CRJ-700. I know it's a bit smaller (64 seats in a 2- or 3-class config), but it gets up & flying much quicker than the E170. It usually gets up in the high-3,000's, low-4,000's (takeoff field length) on a hot day at SL. I don't know much about the CR9's takeoff perf. It's thrust:weight ratio is better than the 170, I just assumed that was sufficient. Anyone out there know for sure?

Just seems like CRQ is more of a turboprop market than a jet market. QX received DOT approval for SJC-CRQ a while back, it would probably be a great route for them.

Last edited by HAL39; 08-29-2011 at 02:07 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply