I couldn't agree with ACL re: DPA more...I feel DPA only shoots us in our collective feet. We are essentially saying that we want someone else to handle our affairs. The same people that will handle our affairs come from our same group. These will probably eventually be the same people who would have been at DALPA because they are willing to get off their arses and get involved. I tend to think that similar logic is how "less than desirable govt's" get control of a country. Promise me the world and fix it for me. You're telling me what I want to hear so it must be right? PLEASE...there would be no conflict of interest if we didn't allow a conflict. Our scope votes allowed a conflict and our scope votes can terminate the conflict. There's no need to shoot ourselves in the foot so that we can waive a bloody stump and show "the man" we are in charge. I prefer to cruise this site for underboob but I get distracted on occasion.