View Single Post
Old 09-23-2011 | 03:09 PM
  #76315  
Bill Lumberg
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
CW from who? Not my reps, not my reps from my previous base.

I think that the MEC will know what the MAJORITY of the pilots want based on a high completion rate on the survey.

A sound case will be made with the NC and the professional negotiators.

"Buckle down and achieve it".....Like UCAL, AA, LCC? Like SWA who has never set a bar for pilot compensation and has had a part in bringing the legacy packages DOWN over the last 25 years?

News flash.....It doesn't matter what you or I WANT!!!!

It only matters what the Company will say yes to, and if they won't say yes, then whatever it takes to convince a majority of the voting members of the NMB think is a legitimate offer and that we should be allowed decline a Proffer of Aribtration and start a 30-day cooling off period to press our case.

Nothing else will affect an outcome to our liking.

Changing the bargaining agent will not improve our ability to do the above. ALPA has a better track record of successfully arguing in front of the NMB than any other representational agency available.

Again, why would any REP benefit from not maximizing the value of a new PWA? They have to work and feed their families' under the agreement like anyone else!!!!!!
The Q&A up North sounded a lot like that. "Aim Low" so the NMB doesn't get mad and throw us in a corner was the theme. Just because the APA Chair demanded a 50% immediate raise, that should mean we shouldn't even attempt anything close to restoration, because, seemingly according to these specific reps, we must be just like AA, in everyones' minds. (especially the NMB) Even though the financials aren't even close, because we are similarly sized, we must be THE SAME. The bag tag stickers should read "Aim Low" and "Shallow it out a bit."