Originally Posted by
oldmako
The argument is with the way the change is being implemented and the scope of the change coupled with minimal training and virtually zero input from the guys driving the plane.
Moving to a QRH, no big deal.
Changing a ton of procedural stuff and SOPs with the stroke of a pen and lip service to safety, big deal.
Glad I'm off the fleet.
Skewering and belittling guys who happen to have a different opinion shows a fair amount of amount of hubris in my book.
Precisely!! Arguing out of their minds about something that is not the question at the moment! Are they philosophical discussions to be had about one procedure vs another? Off course!! But the subject of contention happens to be something entirely different, IE. to promote a more comprehensive method of merging and delivering the process of training, and the current offering raises enough questions regarding safety. Hopefully the arguments are solid enough for a judge's injunction.