View Single Post
Old 10-02-2011 | 01:57 PM
  #77121  
acl65pilot's Avatar
acl65pilot
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Different time and era.

Today we have a handful of major airlines that basically subsidize many regionals.

Today we have conflict of interest with the same regionals, and newer ones, as they fly larger equipment in greater numbers than in '95

Today we have potentially bankrupting judgements against ALPA being decided after a jury has found them guilt of DFR.

Today we have airlines living under bankruptcy contracts struggling to restore wages and benefits while a tone deaf ALPA continues to live lavishly.

I could go on and on; I'll leave it for others.

However, ALPA is now like an over extended game of Jenga. One mistep and the whole structure comes down. If DAL left ALPA, could they survive without the revenue? Would the other members agree that an increase in dues would be exceptable to maintain ALPA? Would we agree to that if UAL left and DAL remained? How about an assesment to cover their legal failings?

Point is ACL, PPA and DPA are not even comparable. In all likelihood if DPA or UPA or any other independent is formed as a result of a move from ALPA, ift will be due to self inflicted wounds.

The potentially biggest self inflicted wound will be the opener.
We will more than likely not see the opener(s)

I would love for DPA to be the answer, but it isn't. Given where this industry is going, and what we will be dealing with in the next decade, a National Union with localized MEC's is the only way to fight against the effects of Transnational airlines. Ergo, we have to fix it. If we as a group choose not to, we will suffer the effects of turning inward.