Originally Posted by
newKnow
It looks like you have something special with Newton though.
Now imagine a Bears team, with a Cam?
Now imagine a Bears team, with a Cam, and a Calvin Johnson. What a freak show that'd be.
as for Carolina, my new adopted team, they're 1-3. Which is about where most of the playoff teams from last year seem to be.
Originally Posted by
Timbo
BB, I agree, but here's a thought, what about Option 3?
Option 3 is where all the DPA guys (who are dues paying DALPA members) show up at their LEC meetings and DEMAND the changes they seek, through the process already in place.
Why they want to reinvent the wheel is beyond me, if they put half the effort into working within the system already in place that they are putting into replacing the system, well, it would work out much better for them, and quicker.
You could finally see political parties arise in LEC votes, and to me that's a good thing.
I mean during presidential and congressional election times most candidates are somewhere near the middle, most. And when they're there, especially those who are on the other side of the fence, what do you say? That's [insert cuss word] - "They're lying! They're just trying to win an election!" And that's kind of what you wonder about REP elections. Because what's nice about those (D)'s and (R)'s are that you know where they'll most likely be when the rubber hits the road. I like political parties. The founders weren't crazy about them, but they were there all along.
If a LEC candidate is a (DPA) beside his name then you know what you're voting for. It's not a bad idea, the question is do you pull that trigger if you're the DPA and run a simultaneous "assault" on ALPA?