Originally Posted by
shiznit
STOP MANAGING EXPECTATIONS DOWN!!!!!!
Hilarious! Is THIS the new talking point memo from Shill Central? Too funny.
Originally Posted by
shiznit
SWA is NOT a comparision,
Obviously DALPA didn't think so because they lied about SWA in the contract comparisons. And if DALPA really considered SWA's contract unacceptably low, wouldn't DALPA exaggerate SWA's contract
upward so as to make ours look worse? Instead DALPA exaggerated SWA's contract
downward so as to make ours look better by comparison...thus needing less of an increase.
Then there's the whole issue of DALPA waiting until our survey closes before releasing data on AF/KLM and our other international competitors...but I hate to pile on.
Originally Posted by
shiznit
I'm sick and tired of DPA types shortchanging the upside of the "acceptable range" by using SWA!!!.
At least DPA knows the truth about SWA because we've actually contacted SWAPA...unlike DALPA that has not contacted SWAPA. Much better to just make stuff up about the SWAPA contract. And nobody has said the SWAPA contract constitutes the "upside acceptable range" of our contract. But then again, accuracy has never been your strong suit.
Carl