Originally Posted by
tomgoodman
FTB,
That might work, but I think the Court of Appeals upheld the ruling against GE not because their offer was unreasonable, but because they refused to negotiate about it or even consider counter-offers. That was seen as an assault on the collective bargaining process, even if the opening offer was fair and generous. My interpretation could be wrong, of course.
Assuming your interpretation is correct, then we build in some fluff. Pad in an additional 10 or 20% above the SWA+ reasonable premiums. For scope we can allow an additional 20 or 30 fifty seat RJ's to be outsourced for an extra year or two. You know, just to be reasonable.