Originally Posted by
DAL 88 Driver
I agree that sounded good and was more in line with what I want to hear from TO. However, I'm reminded of Bill Clinton's "definition of is." I'd like for TO to elaborate a little more on his idea of "significant." I've heard the COLA we obtained to our bankruptcy/emergency rates described as "significant." I hope we're not talking that kind of "significant."
I agree - it's nice to see some kind of talk from the top. I do agree with the fact that in public there won't/shouldn't be specifics about what we are going for. Another thing is I am praying that everyone is putting high goals in their surveys to support a robust opener. Since I never saw a dime from C2K I am looking to make a lot more money with a lot less work in the next contract.