View Single Post
Old 10-24-2011 | 08:46 AM
  #78672  
forgot to bid's Avatar
forgot to bid
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
It is what we want to hear. Particularly the lie about "we have not found a suitable 100 seat airframe." This lie has been often repeated while, in fact, they have been buying 100 seat airframes (configured with 76 seats) for several years now and have bought hundreds of them.

The CRJ700/900 and E175 have MD88/90, 737-700, A319/320 economics and similar cost per seat mile statistics. We need to realize that our contract does not have a 76 seat cap, as much as it has a 160 seat floor. As long as we allow management to outsource our small jet flying and our large jet flying (AF/KLM JV) they'll continue to grow their operation while simply leaving us behind.

I know we pilots are well educated far beyond our intelligence and aren't likely to blurt out "LIAR" at a road show ... but maybe someone could respectfully ask "what is Delta's core business?" The follow up question should be, "then why do we make such great effort to avoid doing any flying ourselves?"

New marketing slogan ... "Delta we're pigeons ... we don't fly unless there's no other choice."
Great post.

It's sad, but we've replaced 179 Boeing 732s and NWA DC9-1s and DC9-3s with 255 CRJ7/9s and E-Jets.

They certainly found their 100 seat replacement jet plus some. The only reason they may supposedly look at bringing a 100 seat size jet to mainline is if they can get 717s from SWA for a really good price. Otherwise there is nothing they want.