View Single Post
Old 10-26-2011 | 02:49 AM
  #7  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Cubdriver
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

But if his story is true, he can probably show-

1. His flights are incidental to his business in that he goes only to place B or C and comes straight back to place A afterwards. Or, if elsewhere his various destinations are easily shown to be legitimate work places with documentation for everyone since he may be going to a job site instead of a formal location.
2. The flight times form a pattern supporting a work schedule which is easily verified.
3. The passengers are known coworkers and colleagues and a log of their contributions, flights etc. is kept.
4. The destination is not some resort location unless it can be shown the resort is a work place.
5. Holding out was minimal (technically none) and consisted of word of mouth among colleagues. Craigslist is not a good idea.

If these conditions all exist in essence, I do not see why he can't use the private pilot rule about sharing expenses (14 CFR FAR 61.113(b)(1)) to make these flights. The use of a turbine is little exotic, but there are private pilots who own and operate some smaller passenger turbines such as King Airs and Meridians. But the story needs to check out.
Reply