I get this kind of stuff a lot from ALPA apologists like yourself. You see facts as insults, and that's why I refer to folks like you as ALPA apologists. When facts don't matter to you, and your only defense is to claim you've been insulted, we're probably just wasting our time talking to each other.

When I state the jury's verdict against ALPA in the TWA suit, that's not an insult...it's simply a fact. When apologists like you refer to the jury as "the OJ jury" or "the Casey Anthony jury", that's an insult.

When I state the judge's verdict against ALPA for ALPA trying to bust their own in-house union, that's not an insult...it's simply a fact.

When I state that an ALPA attorney was fined and given a Rule 11 sanction for lying about an opposing attorney who is being considered for seat on the Missouri State Supreme Court, that's not an insult...it's a fact.

It's always funny to be scolded for hurling insults, by ALPA apologists who do almost nothing but insult people for wanting to vote in a different union. Good times.

Carl