Originally Posted by
shiznit
The length of PG's timetable may be a little long.
The idea that disrupting the entire negotiations process for an extended period of time in the middle of a critical Sect. 6 is correct.
If it doesn't worry you, that is a problem.
If you are not concerned about USAPA, SWAPA, APA, etc. problems with the Seham Law firm, that is a problem too.
Talking point #2 from the ALPA apologists fax machine:
"Ensure you always equate a union drive with disrupting negotiations for an unspecified period of time (the longer the better to instill greater fear). If anyone calls you out on this as untrue, immediately start talking about the Seham law firm that the DPA is using to decertify our beloved union."
Carl