Originally Posted by
CAFB 04-12
I thought engineers wrote the T.O.s. ? Why would the AF be writing T.O.s? AFIs I get.
I'm not exactly sure the process for a new airframe, but the -135 has a regular/sometimes irregular FMRC process where anybody who has a stake in a 847 or anything else can join and try to effect the process. It is far removed from the engineers, except as SMEs. Problem is, there is little continuity, especially as the platform gets long on the tooth. If any thing else, the process does not produce the best product, either from a performance or human factor process. Our checklists absolutely suck. There I said it
Maybe somebody in the know can chime in on the -46 process.
Tanker-driver- Completely agree, I'll never see it, just hope DoD doesn't reduce the # of tails.
Frats-
KC