Originally Posted by
APC225
Yea. No kidding. The Fifth Court found that YES Continental was a hostile work environment for reservists but NO it didn't violate the law because USERRA only covered working status, not working conditions.
I corrected this as they didn't find it was hostile--just that it didn't matter because of the definition of the word "benefit." A non-hostile work environment is apparently not a "benefit" of this law (though it is a benefit in anti-discrimination laws). Must have been overlooked by Congress. It's still messed up.