My statement was that I'd rather it fold then continue to be operated separately meaning our contract either be followed or BB close it's doors. To sell small stakes of it for the specific purpose of circumventing our scope language is wrong and if that's his plans then yes I'd rather it be shut down completely. I have reason to support your groups past and continued actions to circumvent our scope language and seniority integration. Changing your argument over time to justify your groups actions doesn't make it any better. No matter how reasonable you try to make the current sales pitch it still boils down that integration is required. If it's not going to happen then the places needs to close shop. A partial ownership where BB still maintains complete control would still allow us to be whipsawed or at the minimal skipped over for future growth opportunities if they were to ever arise.

If the company is to be sold then let it be sold no issues. Don't do a partial split up leaving BB in charge.