Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
I didn't say you said it. I said your question presupposes it. Here's your post again for review:
Semantics
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Did you read the part that says: "If ALPA cannot deliver..." That certainly sounds like your thesis is that ALPA is the only way, and if ALPA can't succeed, who can. If that's not what you meant, great. But your statement belies that.
No, it's what you read into things that don't toe YOUR propaganda line.
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
This kind of false premise is what allows our MEC to behave in their top-down manner. They DO NOT live under this contract. That is the whole point.
And it is ridiculous. Heiko will be here for a long time. I am not sure about the other guys, but good grief Carl.
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Part of the problem here is that you're describing the statements of fact as "vitriol". If you allow fact finding to be described that way, corruption wins.
Carl
Fact finding? Corruption? Really Carl?
Talk about spring loaded..
