Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
When? 3 years from now? Maybe? Or do we only need to touch 50% for an extremely short period of time, then an entirely new 3 year period of unbalance can begin?
This is such a typical example of an MEC administrator dude only telling half the story. Why not tell the whole story alfaromeo? Do you not know it? Why don't you tell us that you were so proud of the language that the whole MEC voted for it? Oh wait...
Clearly many of us see this for the lie that it is. We're also troubled that these lies and half truths keep coming from the permanent MEC bureaucracy whose lifestyle depends on the continued placation of management.
Carl
The NWA JV with KLM said that NW would share 50% with KLM and that 47% (46% was the floor) was in compliance. We had a 12 month lookback and a 24 month lookback for compliance and then the company had a further 6 months to adjust the ratio back within that 4 percentage points (30 months). Then the CBA went on to say that if other airlines were added to the JV that it would be in compliance it NW maintained it's 50% annual KLM ratio, not the ratio of the new JV partners. We were only going to maintain our ratio with KLM not the new group.
Fast forward to the JPWACBA where it became a 50/50 with KLM
and AF not just against our previous KLM numbers like our CBA language. We get half of the combined KLM and AF numbers, then they added a
third airline to their side of the JV and we still retained 50 percent or all the flying while the three of them are dividing up their side of flying into thirds now.
NW 50% KLM
new DL 50% KLM and AF
mou DL 50% KLM and AF and Alitalia
DL 50% | AF/KLM/AZ 50%
Is our half of four airlines total Atlantic flying bigger than their half they are dividing by three?