View Single Post
Old 12-05-2011 | 07:21 PM
  #82562  
76drvr
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
The NWA JV with KLM said that NW would share 50% with KLM and that 47% (46% was the floor) was in compliance. We had a 12 month lookback and a 24 month lookback for compliance and then the company had a further 6 months to adjust the ratio back within that 4 percentage points (30 months). Then the CBA went on to say that if other airlines were added to the JV that it would be in compliance it NW maintained it's 50% annual KLM ratio, not the ratio of the new JV partners. We were only going to maintain our ratio with KLM not the new group.

Fast forward to the JPWACBA where it became a 50/50 with KLM and AF not just against our previous KLM numbers like our CBA language. We get half of the combined KLM and AF numbers, then they added a third airline to their side of the JV and we still retained 50 percent or all the flying while the three of them are dividing up their side of flying into thirds now.

NW 50% KLM
new DL 50% KLM and AF
mou DL 50% KLM and AF and Alitalia

DL 50% | AF/KLM/AZ 50%

Is our half of four airlines total Atlantic flying bigger than their half they are dividing by three?
Did the NWA PWA use block hours as the matrix for compliance or EASKs like we do now? What is the benefit of using EASKs vs block hours?