Originally Posted by
Busboy
Even people that don't stay at a Holiday Inn Express are aware that Earth cools and warms in cycles. There is no point in arguing about that.
The debate is over how much, if any, man is contributing to the current level and rate of warming. Many of you geniuses seem to agree with the minute percentage of qualified scientists that believe humans are not a significant factor in global warming...Rather than the overwhelming majority of scientists, that believe "human induced green house warming" is now occurring.
Now, unlike you APC climatology experts...I'm not completely sure. But, I'm inclined to go with the majority of people that are qualified to have an opinion that anyone should really care about. And, that group of people certainly doesn't include any of you.
Just sayin'.
Uh huh,
The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider | Full Comment | National Post
Originally Posted by
Zoot Suit
THIS is what it's really about.
United Nations climate envoys have proposed the creation of a global "climate court" that would be responsible for enforcing a sprawling set of rules requiring developed countries to cut emissions while compensating poorer countries in order to pay off a "historical climate debt."
In one section, the document calls for developed countries to help poorer countries with "finance, technology and capacity building" so they can "adapt to and mitigate climate change" while helping eliminate poverty. Another section provides that developing countries should receive an amount of money equal to the amount "developed countries spend on defense, security and warfare."
Thats ALL you need to know.
U.N. Floats Global 'Climate Court' To Enforce Emissions Rules | Fox News
Durban: what the media are not telling you | Watts Up With That?
It's all about the Benjamin's. WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION( with billions also pocketed by the usual crowd).
It does seem somewhat curious that the people pushing this are also the people pushing for wealth and power distribution for all sorts of unrelated reasons.
The UN has been the classic soap box for the worst kinds of tyranny the world has ever seen. Science has never been their strong point, nor world peace for that matter. Human rights are their alleged currency, and they have always been corrupt and bankrupt.
Originally Posted by
N2264J
If his explanation about carbon sequestration, the Vostok graph and the Keeling curve in the link I provided is over your head, maybe you should rethink your contempt for his delivery.
It is just too hard for most of us poor knuckleheads to understand, just let the UN do whatever it needs to do with your life and money!
The real problem is that not one prediction has come true, man's activities have not destroyed the climate or even caused a meaningful rise in temperature. Natural cycles quite clearly have done so and will do so in the future.
In its entire history, the UN has never made a scientific breakthrough, it has however been continually involved in some of the most corrupt operations on the planet and these have involved the highest levels of its leadership.
Take another look at the Climategate emails, they display the level of corruption we are dealing with here very clearly. They make it clear that the "consensus" is to pull the wool over the eyes of the world.