Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Absolutely incorrect. If we don't agree with our regional competitors on what is in OUR scope opener, the ALPA president becomes directly involved. All of it completely hidden from us. All of it. That's what the language says.
That is pure speculation on your part. This will be the first full-scale test of it that I'm aware of in a Section 6. And we'll not be privy to what was said in any meetings, or what Moak's actions were.
Absolutely incorrect. The ALPA president MUST insert himself in the process if our regional competitors don't agree with what we want to put into OUR scope opener. And we will never know what Moak's influence was. It's all secret.
Carl
I could care less what Lee wants. There have been disagreements with Dan Ford; who is no longer a ALPA member by the way, and us. He pitched a fit and we did what we wanted to do. We will continue to do so. Like I said, the issue is that most of our guys see pay as more important than fixing the shortcoming in section 1. You need to change that, and once you do the politicians will fall in line.