Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Almost every attorney will tell this group that the case lacks merit. It is clearly spelled out who has the right to DAL coded flying, and no connection type carrier binds DAL or DAL holdings.
"Almost every attorney" said we had no case regarding RAH, when the spirit of our contract was certainly violated via the exploitation of a loophole.
You may have faith in our contract, lawyers, and DALPA's spine, but based on precedent, I do not.
See also "Delta Connection" paint discussion in a parallel thread.