Originally Posted by
Old UCAL CA
Here's a standard negotiating point that many on these types of boards have a tendency not to understand. I see it misunderstood quite often.
Concessionary-type contracts without "snapbacks" are a base-line starting point for new section 6 negotiations...they are the "status quo" whether anybody likes it or not. Improvements do not occur directly as a result of a prior contract being concessionary. Improvements will depend upon the economy and where your competition currently is and going in the contract world, ie, your pilot competition from a labor cost standpoint. Without "snaps," prior concessions have nothing to do with contract improvements.
Please note, I'm not advocating one way or the other. I've done this before and it just is. The opportunity for "auto" improvement/restoration was lost by both pilot groups when "snaps" were not included as part of the original deals.
You 100% correct. This is the new status quo brought to us by the 58% that voted yes on POS 02 without snapbacks. Let me restate my argument; I think it's astonishing that the company apparently believes that UCAL pilots will settle for the status quo in the absence of the exceptional conditions that caused concessions in the first place.