Originally Posted by
gloopy
...As for the terminal bridge, I'm sure we will be bussing pax between the two while the bridge is built, but like I mentioned earlier, I don't expect a whole lot of connections there in the first place. Very few routes flow well through NYC for that and those that do can be done through other hubs just as easily in most cases anyway. The slot swap was primarily about single point O&D and the fact that its 90-something percent outsourced RJ's means mainline won't get very much "feed" in the first place. As an added bonus, we could see down-gauging in JFK and EWR as a result of this if the O&D pax really do prefer LGA. Just enough to outsource, not quite enough to justify mainline. High CASM, inferior product, few to no additional Delta pilot jobs. This is shaping up to make the AS code share check valve look like a good deal. At least we get some widebody feed from the mass outsourcing and narrow-body stagnation on the west coast. All we will get in LGA is supposedly revenue that we hope we will get a piece of. As if we haven't fallen for that trick before.

The bridge is just a red-herring, another talking point to make the pilots shut-up and go away. We fly our pax out of T2, T3 and T4 at JFK and nobody mentions the busses between T3 and T4 as a hindrance...
It's the same lame talking point all over again, we'll really be stupid to be placated with a one-liner.
One more time:
What's good for Delta isn't always good for Delta pilots...
Cheers
George