Originally Posted by
Scott Stoops
Unclear... but that doesn't change/fix anything. This is such a short-sighted company... I have 27 years to go at this company, and they've lost me. I was an asset, but they lost me a long time ago. This only solidifies that position. Such a bunch of thieves and thugs, yet there are clear winners here. The actions of the CAL MEC are not helping the cause of our collective group IMHO. Then again, neither are the actions of the UAL MEC. What a cluster. Absolute train wreck if they do this. I hope "they" understand the consequences, but I suspect they don't.
Also, it is a little bit different being displaced by pilots on your seniority list when flying gets realigned by the company you work for compared to being displaced by pilots not on your seniority list, doing your flying, in jets that you had in your fleet just a handful of years back that were parked to facilitate a merger.
Agree with the displacement and seniority issues, and as a commuter, i get the QOL but if it's not airtight in the the contract ( and it's not)' then they will do whatever they will. Not sure, what actions of the CAL MEC has forced the company to shift flying at your expense? Ive been hearing about right sizing since day 1. As I understand after talking to union leadership today, the domicile issue was going to happen regardless as both UAL and CAL MEC had no contractural leverage in this area. Would'nt be surprised if the CLE 737 hub is next on the list.