View Single Post
Old 01-04-2012 | 06:35 AM
  #33  
CALFO
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FACSofLife
What part of your CBA was violated in reference to the 767-200 parking? I'm just curious. I thought it was in reference to the TPA "flying ratio" provision, but I'm always open to the real facts. Thanks.
The 767-200 grievance related entirely to the CAL contract '02 and had nothing to do with the TPA. The CAL contract contains language to protect CAL pilots in the even of a merger. The UAL contract does not have this language and therefore the UAL pilots are in a much more precarious position. The language that was negotiated in the TPA for block hour protection was to protect the UAL pilots as CAL's contract already had it.
Reply