To clarify, the TOS are more restrictive than a PG-13 rating:

PG-13 – Parents Strongly Cautioned – Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13. These films may contain sex references, up to four uses of explicit language, drug innuendo, strong crude/suggestive humor, mature/political themes, moderately long horror moments and/or moderate action violence. There are usually no restrictions on non-sexual nudity.

So, basically no one violated the TOS as it's written. Did anyone post nude pics? Nope. Scantily-clad, sure, but nothing you couldn't see at the beach. And frankly, a lot less than you'd see at South Beach.

So, again, what's the standard you're holding us too?

Naturally, the picture of the naked guy's butt is still up.

Added: Okay, ACL, finally the truth comes out. You guys can do whatever you see fit, despite the written rules we've been given. Care to clarify the standards for us, or do you just opt for the Supreme Court definition?