Originally Posted by
captainv
To clarify, the TOS are more restrictive than a PG-13 rating:
PG-13 – Parents Strongly Cautioned – Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13. These films may contain sex references, up to four uses of explicit language, drug innuendo, strong crude/suggestive humor, mature/political themes, moderately long horror moments and/or moderate action violence. There are usually no restrictions on non-sexual nudity.
So, basically no one violated the TOS as it's written. Did anyone post nude pics? Nope. Scantily-clad, sure, but nothing you couldn't see at the beach. And frankly, a lot less than you'd see at South Beach.
So, again, what's the standard you're holding us too?
Naturally, the picture of the naked guy's butt is still up.
PG-13 is what the TOS says.
My definition of that is seeing nipples, areolas, genitals either though clothes or out in the open, or something that is generally unacceptable for children under the age of 13.
I know the slip that you are trying to play, but simply put, this whole deal has gotten the attention of all of the Mods and Admins. Simply put, they are not paying very close attention, have stated what is acceptable and what is not, and have warned some that if the the line is crossed bans will be given out. It is the desire of this boards managers to keep this board as professional as possible without losing the fun of it. The Mods have every right to do what they want with no explanation needed. I refuse to undermine their authority. Their decision as stated in the TOS is final. Same with the site admins.
It may irk a lot of people, but frankly a lot of people have pmed to state that they are happy with the crack down. In the end it is what it is. This is a great resource for Delta pilots, we all would like you to continue the longest running thread, abet, with a little more candor.