View Single Post
Old 01-19-2012 | 04:04 PM
  #86149  
porpilot
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Thanks FTB,

I understand your concern, but here are some points to consider:

1) Under the old system, we needed 30% Reserves. Under the new system, 15%. The new system is far, far more efficient, from the company's standpoint. They absolutely hated paying four guys guys CAP-5 hours, where two flew nothing, and the other two flew max. So now they can replace the four with two at 70 hours. Beautiful.

Unless you're a pilot.

Would you like 15% more pilots?

2) Under the old system, the hierarchy doesn't start at 50%, where 50% and below has to pick up "someone else's work". 50% and below might fly more, but everyone along the list had the option to go high, or low, for any given day, any given flying. That ordered all flying, from 1%, to 100%. IOW, everyone, in seniority order, could try to hide from the crap, or go high for the juicy stuff. The bottom 50% flew more, sure, but then again, under the new system, the bottom 50% of Reserves, or the bottom 15%, are unconcerned with Reserves at Delta, because they're busy flying at ASA and Pinnacle.



You have to look at the effects of the entire system on staffing, and the way it worked before, when things were right, rather than worry about about who gets to have maggots in their rice now that we're all in a camp.


Did I read that right. We allowed the company to reduce reserve staffing by 15%? What did we get in return. If this is true, DALPA should have used this as a bargaining credit.