Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
As the policy manual states, it would be significant contractual change. I cannot see the reps not sending this to a vote. When talking theory with many of these guys, all have said, "Of course it will go to MEMRAT if it were to happen." Remember, it is still and "if"
Day Two of the MEC meeting is tomorrow in DC. The NMB was there today, and DAL's leaders are there tomorrow.
I feel much better now that you've clarified "significant". Is this like the MEC talking about "significant" contract improvements in our next contract? Or like the MEC stating that their policy of constructive engagement has led to "significant" improvements in our current contract?
This is a very significant post from you acl.
Carl