You sir, are incorrect. What you're apparently lacking is the context for the aforementioned comment. The intent was to intimate to the masses that whilst "he" (read dexim) my be of a certain opinion, he represents a rapidly growing minority of those within the L-UAL camp. I, like many others imho, intend not to dwell/anchor in the thrash that has occurred as of late amongst our collective "pilot group". While the lessons learned shouldn't be lost going forward, neither should they be the focus of our "collective" attention. Therefore I felt the best methodology to surmise and convey my thoughts/feelings regarding this issue was to simply state "got-it" (translated = message received and understood, but less wordy and stuff). At that point the stage is set to discontinue engaging in discussion regarding related subject matter, no further discussion expected or required.

Your assumption that dexim is "under skin" is a clear miss, this is incorrect. However the resolution to nullify the offender - "Operation ignore" should be fully and completely adopted and implemented, without delay...I concur.

Let the games begin.

Cheers,
Horhay