Originally Posted by
AxlF16
Correct. Sure, Dexim is stirring up some folks with his posts. And sure, it may lead to some disunity -- ON THIS FORUM. I didn't think I could find a smaller echo chamber than the UAL ALPA pilots forum...then I came here. Sorry, but if Dexim ****es you guys off, it still won't even ripple the entire pilot groups. The problem is that he speaks the truth in a lot of ways. I won't rub it in and belabor the point, but you can rest assured that I've gotten the message from the CAL leadership (and pilot group by default) loud and clear. The result is that I don't trust your leadership, and from what I see so far I bet that the majority of CAL pilots will walk along behind P(OS)ierce picking up the goodies while feigning ignorance and unity. This is the message that I'm sending to my LEC leadership -- I just choose to keep it of this forum (for the most part).
Just because Dexim is the only UAL pilot one here espousing this view, you shouldn't dismiss him as an aberration.
Question for all CAL pilots:
-Do you think that both Master Chairmen should sign an agreement to exclude all JCBA items/issues/terms from the SLI process?
That's what I figured. Your comment that the majority of CAL pilots are most likely in step with pierce is supported by the fact that the comments by them, following your post, are concerned with being alluded to a scab and other irrelevancies to the points on the thread.
I doubt they will directly answer your question or this one here:
Do you think that during the SOC debate it would have been better for unity purposes and leverage for the contract if pierce hadn't said (to the effect): "We don't see anything wrong with the SOC training"?