Originally Posted by
goaround2000
Clearly you didn't read the first post, a simple 5.5 years is enough, we all know the realities of the industry, but for the purpose of contrast and comparison time to date (as stated in the first post) it has every bit of relevance.
It's still meaningless. Because once you get hired and don't upgrade at 5.5 yrs, you'll beotch about how you were told your upgrade would have happened by then.
Did you take stats in college? Did you read the first post? Do you understand the concept of historical data contrast and comparison? Are you aware that I've been doing this for over 8 years and I'm not actively looking for employment?
Holy crap, I bet you're a joy to fly with! Learn to read and accept when you're wrong and both your personal and professional life will go a lot easier! For the purpose of this thread the number is relevant.