<<what a load>>.

If the load you are referring to is the terms of hire that freeze us at whatever year pay at which we last got escorted off the property by a pimply faced intern until such time as we've been on the CAL side of the fence for that many years +1, but if we return to the UAL side of the fence none of the time spent on the CAL side counts toward longevity for pay purposes, then I agree with your assessment.

Sadly, that is not the load you refer to but reference instead a load that isn't a load at all, just a statement of opinion about the dissatifying nature of the facts.


<<continue smoking whatever merger conspiracy crack floats your boat.>>

I'm more of a merger conspiracy bong water drinker, but thanks for the suggestion.


Flying around playing yours, mine, and ours with you, Rocketiii, and your 'us and them' fellow travelers looks to be shaping up to be pantloads of fun.

And we won't even have an ADF to tune up to an AM radio station and enjoy the one bit of common ground we have so far, an agreement on the Stones Ruling.

As Tears Go By,


Kleenex Willy