Originally Posted by
USMCFLYR
Is there really some point to cross here when you are considered to have the intention to step foot on the aircraft?
It would seem to me that if he got dressed in his uniform, didn't mention his condition, rode in the hotel van to the airport, passed through security, and made it to the gate - - - all of those would count as an 'intention to step foot on the aircraft'.
I'm asking. Would it make a difference if security stopped rather than having made it through to the gate? Maybe the way I'm looking at it - 'intention to step onto the aircraft' was just a poor choice of words - in a legal sense in any matter.
USMCFLYR
agreed. I was borrowing words from the previous post. When he awoke, took a ****, put on his uniform and climbed into that van, his flying days were over (if he got caught) Intention to fly began when he straightened his tie. And yes, I am a lawyer. I play one on T.V.